I am not too excited about crimes without victims, that is, the only victim is the perpetrator. Those who want to self-destruct - if others should not bear the consequences - have the right to do so. Everyone has a moral responsibility for their own people.
Crime against others is another matter. No one has the right to cause physical harm to another person. No one has the right to hurt us emotionally or economically. Obviously there is a certain degree of damage. He did not bring the harm caused by torture, rape or murder. In a just world, punishment must be suitable for crime.
Perfect justice must begin with absolute guilt evidence. This is often not the case, as many prisoners are acquitted by DNA testing. Unfair punishment is one of the most cruel forms of torture. In every process of opportunity, the innocent desire to a large extent measures the reasons why our criminal justice system is often caught in technical and loopholes.
If a person commits a violent crime, what should we do? The first step in a rational approach is to decide if we want violent criminals to walk freely on the streets. We can be "good and understanding" and let them do a little consultation. But the evidence did not prove to be effective. To be on the safe side, as more and more violent criminals roam the streets, we must arm ourselves.
If we want to protect ourselves from these criminals, then there are two logical choices:
We locked them in a six-foot box off the ground after executing them. The most correct way to kill is the way they treat victims. This is a permanent solution that is ok and fair, but it makes me feel uncomfortable because there is always a real guilt problem.
We lock them in some type of security agency. Since I am trying to come up with a logical solution, the agency will not be our current prison system.
The second option provides room for new exemptions from innocent evidence. But what if it is not a prison? Criminals should be placed in a safe returning workplace. There, they will work hard to produce useful labor or goods for the society, commensurate with the damage they cause. The victim's medical expenses, lost work and incapacity must be paid by the perpetrator. In addition, all social expenses for investigations, trials and accommodation during the period of imprisonment must be paid. [Those who are guilty recognize and reduce legal costs are a good motivation.] The time required for economic recovery basically determines the length of the word. For example, if you attack another person and disable them, then you can spend any necessary time reminding them to take care of them. Those who accept another life must use their productive work for life instead of their own lives to repay the society and the families of the victims.
Isn't this an obvious solution? It's unreliable to just pretend to be a social marker for police and legal work and to protect offenders. Why do victims and society pay for the sins of the perpetrators?
How do you force someone to settle his or her debt in prison? Give them a choice. Either do this or have no food or shelter. This is a law that works through nature. Why not apply it to humans? How do you maintain discipline on the farm? Well, a hard day's work will leave more energy than rest. As it is now, the prisoners who sit in the cell all day have nothing to do with their energy, but plan more wrongdoing. According to my thinking, those who have problems will be punished for extending their stay and extending their work schedule.
This is a fair and just way to stop the crime and offset the damage it causes. It does not have the potential to unjustly take the lives of others, because time will prove to be innocent. I am not talking about chain gangs here, but under the conditions of work and life, the products of the labor force should be transmitted to the victims and the society. American companies are always looking for cheaper labor. Ok, just on our own shore, tens of thousands.
from
Nothing is better than letting a person work hard to be more awake and consume energy to think about evil behavior. For those small criminals who work under these recovery conditions and are subsequently released, they will know what work is, actually improve their resume, and promoting crime on the street means working hard and having the motivation to not return. If they repeat offense, then society will not suffer. Criminals should be self-sustaining, even profit centers, not economic traps.
Our current penal system does not work. For society, this is a huge and unfair price. However, for many people, it is both punishment and deterrence. About three-quarters of the US prison space has been built over the past decade. In California, the probability of a person living or working in a prison is one in 200.
This is a crazy state of affairs. I hope that I can become the guardian of the world and solve all problems tomorrow.
Orignal From: Crime and punishment
No comments:
Post a Comment