The term "domestic abuse" refers to "domestic abuse". Rather than domestic violence, it means a broader form of suffering beyond the physical harm that women [and men] receive from their partners. Many people are in an unhealthy state. Relationship; there is no need to equate to abusive relationships, but confusion may arise if the definition of this crime is expanded. Will it be domestic abuse' not domestic violence' Is it criminalizing bad relationships and removing the focus from the true nature of this crime? Is it simple semantics or will it expand the definition of domestic violence? For Family Abuse' Encourage changing society's perceptions of domestic violence, and the people who are reasonably likely to be involved?
According to the dictionary, abuse is "v.1. Used for adverse effects or for bad purposes 2. Treated with abuse or violence 3. Dealt with insults and offenses", and violence is: "1. 1. Physically involved behavior The power to harm, hurt or kill 2. Emotional or destructive natural forces "However, offensive and cruel can cause harm – especially if there are hidden physical factors or physical damage. History is insulting or coexisting with verbal abuse. There are many interesting subdivisions of the terms "abuse". And violence' For example, in a study conducted by the Ministry of the Interior, the definition of domestic violence depends on the victim. Explanation. If different agencies use different terms, how to specify what is or is not acceptable behavior, and then whether such behavior constitutes a criminal offence.
So what is domestic violence? Essentially, it is where the current or former partner causes physical or emotional harm or harm to the other party; if a partner is physically or emotionally forced to obey another person's wishes [the offender is a male and female victim] And vice versa, or two partners belong to the same gender]. Although many people may think that domestic violence includes a husband's personal attack on his wife, this is not a unique definition. In addition to physical harm, one partner has emotional, economic and social restrictions on another partner. This may be a particular problem if a partner is the only working adult or if his or her income far exceeds their partner. Emotional abuse can be a place where a partner continues to disparage speech and devalue achievements and appearance; social constraints can include manipulating a person's actions and constantly asking someone where they are going. Speech damage can almost cause fear of bodily harm; especially when any type of accusation is directed not only to the primary victim [ie, partner/pre-partner] but also to children, pets or other relatives. In addition, if a verbal attack or threat is often accompanied by a physical attack, the victim occurs on another level, as the arrest of a physical attack may be as traumatic as the attack itself.
The Ministry of the Interior itself defines domestic violence as: "any violence between incumbent or former partners in a close relationship, where and when the violence occurred... [it may include physical, sexual, emotional or economic abuse] . However, this may be purely for the purpose of obtaining specific information about the victim, not any legal or mandatory definition, for the strict interpretation of the institution [including criminal justice institutions]. Given its intertwined violence and abuse, there may be confusion and its definition expanded further in flyers against domestic violence. The leaflet describes a more obvious "shock." And 'Kick' more controversial tells you that you are ugly, tell you what to wear, ' call you fail ' and shout '. These latter phrases and definitions are so extensive that they may actually destroy their purpose. Practical explanations may be obvious to policy makers, scholars and researchers, and sometimes even the police [because derogatory comments and shouts are part of the abuse model, not in isolated events], but More widely seen flyers and promotional events. The public may cause loss of meaning. This is because, in arguments and disagreements - in various relationships - yelling and publishing defamatory statements can be very common, and the intent behind these statements may not be as good as the actual expected damage or when used as the actual expected injury. More sinister physics or not].
Definitions may also be misunderstood in other situations. What happens when bad relationships become verbal abuse; when a couple insults each other - sometimes both and both are guilty - is this domestic abuse? Is it possible to have a physical or verbal attack? Does any party mean that the police [or other agencies] need or need to intervene? Arguments, discussions [ intense or otherwise] and even occasional outbreaks may help solve problems; releasing tension can make relationships healthier and stronger. What happens if neighbors contact the police because of the number of arguments: Domestic abuse, not domestic "violence" does it mean that police attendance is mandatory for a simple argument? Are all relationships that have experienced rough periods under supervision, intervention, and even prosecution? When domestic violence is used as a term other than domestic violence, this is clearly not the expected result; nevertheless, the definition/terminology [and any interpretation thereof] is still subjective, even if there are guiding principles.
Perhaps a major problem with terminology is that it creates confusion, misunderstanding and even indifference between institutions - and society as a whole - to address the crime of domestic violence itself. Is domestic violence a crime only when subjected to physical violence? If the husband shouts so loudly that the neighbor can hear him making a derogatory comment on his wife - sometimes because the volume is low and not hear her, it is a criminal act; even if there is no violence, will this sentence be taken by the family? Abuse? Of course, this seems to be the implication of the "Report of the Special Committee on Criminal Violence [1975]" proposed by the Metropolitan Police: "...the general principle of the police...do not interfere with the husband's The situation and the wife... The wife suffered some personal attacks, and any attack by the husband on the wife constituted serious physical injury...". Here, the focus is on physical injuries - although English law stipulates that the attack is a fear of physical harm rather than actual physical harm. This is known as technical attack ' "Intentionally or unintentionally making the defender an imminent force to arrest". Psychological trauma can be treated by a constant threat of bodily harm and any bodily harm; for this kind of suffering, the "1997 Prevention of Harassment Act" can be used, even though it causes fear. Must occur at least twice [Articles 1-3]. Government publications use the term "domestic violence". And family abuse ' can be exchanged - what if other people do not know the difference?
One reason for changing the deadline from violence to abuse is that it avoids the mere fact that personal attacks are criminal and "abuse". Indicates the various behaviors used by the partner. A broader term can help victims understand their partners. Action is unacceptable. Problems can arise when the boundaries of terms and explanations become blurred. If a person commits a crime of "domestic abuse" technically, then whether he is more likely to be the target of attack than his female partner. Because of gender perceptions [ie, women in relationships are more likely to be victims than offenders, or women are less likely to cause physical harm to male partners]? Domestic violence may be too narrow, limiting what people consider to be criminal offences and worth reporting. The approach of the various agencies in different locations may also be different; if a police officer responds positively to the victims, if they are proactive in dealing with domestic events because of the broader "illness". Then the use of these terms may be reasonable. A more reflective interpretation of domestic abuse may lead to earlier intervention by the police, otherwise it may be left before the consequences of the victim and his family are severe.
The Scottish administration has resolved the issue of "domestic abuse". When discussing domestic violence through its policies and campaigns. Although it was difficult to find the reason behind the decision, the definition was agreed in September 1999. In 1998, the Scottish Family Abuse Partnership was established and a national strategy was developed to ensure that women have access to the necessary institutions, assistance and so on.
In 2001, the Prevention of Abuse [Scotland] Act was introduced, with definitions of "abuse" and "abuse". Includes violence, harassment, threatening behavior and any other behavior that causes or may cause physical or mental harm, fear, panic or pain. A draft national strategy was developed in October 2002: key elements include raising public awareness; education; training; services for women and children; working with men who use violence; legislation; and workplace strategies. The strategy has produced campaigns for offenders and victims, but it also shows that neighbors, friends and others should pay attention to domestic abuse when buying, and don't ignore these signs. The first of these movements began in 1995 with the goal of the perpetrators...
Orignal From: Domestic or domestic violence - Is the term important?
No comments:
Post a Comment