what is from
fact from
What is it? from
Fiction from
In novels and stories
In literature, the line between fact and fiction is sometimes vague. In from
Fiction from
What often happens is that the author claims no from
conscious from
I plan to add autobiographical elements to the novel/story. But is he/she not? How does it affect the quality of us, readers and/or books?
In any case, when you read a novel or a story, you may rarely ask what the novel in the book is and what the author's autobiographical element is. Why are you doing this? Do you know how this or that way is different? For example, do you know that the plot or character of some books is based on certain aspects of the author's own life, which makes the book more credible? More attractive power? Or does a book have its own merits, whether it is based in part on the author's autobiographical elements?
do you know from
fact from
with from
Fiction from
Fuzzy add any value or credibility of the novel/story?
This is a fact well known to Belgian writers. from
George Weston [1903 - 1989], he published about 500 novels and short stories, many of his characters are people he knows.
As we all know, many short stories of American writers are like this. from
Raymond Carver [1938 - 1988] There are some autobiographical elements [ie drunkenness, divorce and couples].
Similar cases we found from
Jonathan Safran Foer Comments on his latest work ["I am here", 2016]. In the 11 years after Foer published his last book ["extremely loud and getting closer", 2005], his new novel was about interpersonal relationships.
When asked if the book was based on autobiographical elements, Foer replied that he often asked himself the same question. He admitted to divorcing his predecessor after 10 years of marriage and said that he had been writing about marriage and divorce for the past 11 years.
Therefore, without a clear answer, we see again that the facts and fictions seem vague, mixed and intertwined.
Once again, knowing the situation, does it add quality to Foer's book?
If the author does not tell us what the description of rape is based on?
Jessicanor The first novel, "Lucky The Happiness Girl" [Simon & Schuster, 2016] describes a rape of a group of 14-year-old girls in a very credible way. Some critics asked Knoll about the research she did before writing this book, which helped her describe the rape in such a reliable way. A few weeks after the book was published, Noel admitted in an interview that rape had occurred. from
her from
[As Knoll explained in the Young Women Newsletter and website "Lenny" on March 29, 2016]
If Knoll should have from
Do not from
Tell us, is this different? How long does the author tell us? Is "fiction" based in part on some of the author's autobiographical elements, is this really important?
Can the author passionately write about love and passion without personal experience?
Israeli writer's novel from
Judith Kazil "Dear Dear Anne" [Feminist Press, 2008] tells the story of an erotic love between a 14-year-old girl and her 27-year-old teacher. Almost, their love is "unique" to both of them. But is it possible for the author to describe love and sex in such a detailed and beautiful way, but not [similar, at least to say at least] personal experience?
Is it an author who focuses on the page, describing in more detail the erotic love between the two; their desire for each other; their "sex games"; their addiction, forbidden love, at least to some extent Based on her own experience [even when it comes to "using" the writing process as a self-therapy]?
After reading Katzir's book, one might think about how many autobiographical elements the book is based on. This cute, vivid, clear, emotional description of love and attraction - they may all come from Katzir's imagination, or is it possible, only possible, she must have experienced from
some from
[Similar] Can you write down the extent of its love and attraction in a convincing way?
Katzir's "Dear Dear Anne" is just one example of this, showing that in the literature it is not always possible to distinguish the author's imagination and elements from the author's life. from
These two are often blurred from
.
whether know Nabokov Does synesthesia make a difference?
May not know the Russian-American writer from
Vladimir Nabokov [1899 - 1977; the famous novel "Lolita", 1955] - There is synaesthesia [a neurological disease in which a sensory stimulus produces a completely different feeling. For example, a person with synesthesia You may see the colors in the letters; you can see the colors in the food they taste; or you can associate colors with emotions].
Knowing that Nabokov has a general sense can explain why some of the characters in his book are plagued by synesthesia [including the 1930 novel "Defense" and the 1952 "Gift"].
Nabokov has said in the past how synesthesia helps and enriches the lives of people [and readers]: as a text device, authors can use synaesthesia to describe people, places, events and emotions in terms. A variety of senses [this is often the case in poetry. "This kind of technique" "makes the reader feel more "contact" with the story/poetry.
Yet another question of the question is: Does it have any effect on the reader because he knows that the author has a similar experience with his role? Does it add any value to the novel/story?
we do not know. However, having a similar experience may enable writers to "go into his role" and describe them in a more reliable way [in the long run, this can give the novel better credibility and possibly make it "better" "Fictions with a wider and more universal appeal."
Between fiction and fact: Where is the quality of the story?
Entering someone else's mind - even a "normal" person - is also a difficult cause. Even psychiatrists, psychologists and other therapists can't do this without a doubt.
Talking about "non-traditional" people - murderers, madmen, etc. - may even be harder to get into their heads.
In literature, some people claim that good writers who are good at observation and record can indeed enter their personality, whether it is "normal" or "deviant."
Still, this is not an easy task, and we often don't know when writers have had "close contact" with similar cases... Usually, when fiction works join and impress us When it is, there is no difference.
Or is it?
Orignal From: Facts and fiction in the author's novels: the consciousness/unconsciousness of the two
No comments:
Post a Comment