Introduction
Philosophy is the study of general and basic issues. For example, issues related to thought, knowledge, language and values, reality, reason and existence. The difference between philosophy and reality is that it mainly involves rational argumentation. In other words, a person's philosophy may refer to certain beliefs or people's love for wisdom. On the other hand, the real situation seems to be more complicated than the one revealed by philosophy. Most of the time, reality deals with problems in a rigorous way, and philosophy deals with problems in an open way. This suggests that real-world or practical approaches to problem solving often have limitations when applying a set of provided rules to find problem solutions, while philosophical or justified approaches to problem solving often indicate an alternative to exploring possible choices and finding solutions to problems.
There are contradictions between many consciences on issues related to the applicability of overwhelming forces that undermine rules. However, this does not mean that philosophy is ineffective, but implies that a change from a philosophical perspective to a practical perspective can better understand and solve problems related to balancing issues. Therefore, this means that in order to achieve a balanced system for problem solving, practical and philosophical methods must be considered.
Philosophy and methods of individual rights and public protection
The most common problems in today's community are issues related to individual rights and public protection, criminal justice codes of conduct and ethics. When addressing issues related to individual rights and public protection, the actual approach will be based on established rules. For example, the rule says that everyone has their own property and no one else has the right to own their own property. This means that the work in his hands legally gave him property. A person who obtains illegal property is a thief and shall be judged according to law. This is the case, because the law guarantees the security of personal property protection. Regardless of their country, thieves are unprepared for accusing the public according to the law, so thieves are also protected by the public through legal judgment.
Faith in fairness and justice is an important thing in society. Because the use of personal excuses, such as race, race or gender, does not have human rights inequalities. However, in the legal environment, these personal characteristics are considered to be serious problems related to human rights and must be protected by the government or the public. Nevertheless, the 1776 Declaration of Independence emphasized the concept of equality for all men in basic rights such as equal life, happiness and freedom.
To this end, the court chose some equal but different laws and rules in 1896. The rationale behind the law is to protect the equality clauses of African Americans so that they can be loved by whites. This type of rule is created in society to reduce certain segregation based on gender or race to protect the rights of all individuals, as this is a basic public responsibility.
Philosophy and Method of Reward and Punishment in Criminal Justice
The philosophical point of view will argue the reasons behind the thief's actions. Individuals will not snatch or steal other people's property unless it is needed. From a philosophical point of view, society will provide thieves with the opportunity to return stolen property. In fact, thieves will be judged immediately. Humans survive in reasoning. In order for humans to succeed, they must use force to describe their ability to cope with challenges. Society can choose to thank the rules of mutual protection or allow thieves to freely move and survive under their own real conditions. Either way, thieves and society will benefit from this decision, and if they apply philosophical methods, thieves will have a second chance to acquire a new and genuine lifestyle. On the other hand, if practical methods are applied, society has the advantage of legal protection.
Philosophy and methods of using unethical means to achieve lasting goals.
The use of rewards and penalties applicable in criminal justice is unethical when it comes to issues related to the Code of Criminal Justice. For example, a large number of lawyers use a variety of lying methods during the trial to achieve the desired end result. In addition, due to the role of assisting in supporting ethical behavior in criminal justice issues, day-to-day operations require ethical rules, criminal justice systems, and ethics. Individual rights are a moral principle used to sanction and describe freedom of movement in society and society. The most important basic right is to have your own life. Rights are also called rights or powers that an individual can claim.
In addition, rewards can be used to build innocent people and punish them, while sinful people can be free. From a practical point of view, the rules show that when someone commits a crime, they must face trial and they will face persecution based on the evidence provided. In fact, there is no other way to solve crime-related problems. From a philosophical point of view, an investigation is needed to make a fair and equitable judgment. In the absence of loss to the victim, criminals will have a second chance to correct their mistakes and change their lives. In this regard, criminals have the opportunity to improve themselves, and victims have the opportunity to improve the lives of perpetrators by forgiving criminals and gaining a second life.
The recommended use of ethics in decision-making, involving issues in criminal justice
Morality in criminal justice is used for decision making and may include ethical and intelligent investigations. It turns out that morality is a core element in the decision-making process, involving moral dilemmas, and involves codes of conduct, behaviors, and standards of behavior in different societies. The standard-setting approach ranges from cultural relativism to moral absolutism; the idea of highlighting moral diversity seems to provide the best hope for solving relativity problems. The source of investigating ethical standards suggests that natural law, religion, and other forms of law have an impact on shaping ethical standards. Moral understanding is critical to the effective decision-making of criminal justice professionals and the proper working system of criminal justice. On the other hand, ethics in criminal justice provides a way to make ethical decisions, especially in times of uncertainty that require ethical issues. During the day-to-day operations of the criminal justice system, ethics is highly desirable for the purpose of maintaining order.
in conclusion
In short, philosophical and practical methods are crucial to solving problems in a balanced manner in society. While one may have a preference for choosing a solution to the problem, it is necessary to apply both methods when solving the problem in order to provide a balanced solution to the problem that arises. In this way, criminal justice can not only punish criminals, but also change their way of life by correcting the second chance of error.
Orignal From: Philosophy and practical methods of balancing problems
No comments:
Post a Comment