The subject of this review is from
Metals and Philosophy: An Accelerated Course in Brain Surgery from
Edited by William Irwin and published in 2007. It is part of an increasing number of books that look at popular film icons such as The Matrix, The Lord of the Rings, and the Simpsons TV show through a philosophical lens. The book consists of a series of twenty short articles that examine the band of Metallica, the interpersonal relationships between members, and the lyrics of some of the main ideas of Western philosophy.
The main purpose of the book, as well as the entire series, is to introduce the "great creativity" of philosophy to the average reader, while providing a more entertaining place. Philosophy is often taught only in higher education, and only students are forced to teach, they must force themselves to read the reading materials and gain the insight they can gain. This kind of knowledge is not easy, and trying to answer the existence and the most important issues of humanity requires hard thinking. Therefore, the editors of the series tried to show that learning philosophy can be more interesting, and "deep thinking about TV, movies and music will not make you a complete idiot." In fact it may make you a philosopher, one who believes The review of life is not worth living, and those uncensored cartoons are not worthy of attention. "Metallica, one of the most successful bands in history, has been philosophically treated in this part of the series.
As a student, I have studied many philosophy courses at the university and have read another device in this series [ from
The Simpsons and philosophy from
], these books have always been intriguing. This question is worth mentioning: Is this book written for a philosopher interested in Metallica or a Metallica fan interested in philosophy? Is there a difference? Unless they are interested in philosophy, many Metallica fans are unlikely to find themselves in the philosophical part of the local border. But it is equally difficult to imagine that this stereotyped university professor picked up a book called "Books". from
Metal and philosophy from
. However, the fact that more than twenty authors contributed to this series of articles suggests that many philosophical professors, writers and students also appreciate the largest heavy metal band ever. The subject matter in the book also shows that the author knows the lyrics and history of Metallica in order to provide valuable insights into Metallica's work.
Since the book contains 20 articles, it is impossible to review each of the topics presented. These articles are introduced as major issues in philosophy and use James Hutfield's lyrics as the greatest source of material. Investigate issues such as insanity and death penalty through a variety of songs, as well as the relationship between the band and religion and the answer to the meaning of life. No doubt, quite a heavy topic. However, each article is written based on the ultimate goal or readability. While themes often check abstracts, authors use frequent examples, such as quoting lyrics, or using anecdotes in band history. This makes these ideas easier to understand, and the article won't be clarified in long-term exposure to esoteric things. Many papers may be slightly longer to discuss these issues more comprehensively, but each article is sufficient to present a topic, study it in the context of philosophical thinking, and lay some conclusions or areas for further research.
However, while analyzing the lyrics, some articles will review Metallica's overall background and history, and try to answer some of the more controversial ideas presented over the years. These include the band's "selling light" problem, their incompatibility with traditional rock characters, and Lars' battle with the Internet file-sharing site Napster. Did Metallica sell out when it introduced the replacement hard rock album [LOAD]? What role does the disqualification play in shaping Metallica, and why can't they return again? Is Napster about money or something more, and is Lars' is the argument fundamentally correct? The answers are discussed in detail in the book and they may not be what the reader expects. As one of the authors wrote, "Hey, philosophers should be objective – I don't like it better than you do!" But these events and topics are often discussed when talking about Metallica, they have been since 1984. Since the second album of the year, he has been accused of selling. When viewed through a philosophical background, the old text of either party will be given new teeth.
This book is a welcome introduction or reintroduction to the philosophy and thinking of Metallica fans. For serious philosophers who spend time reading original works quoted in prose, it may simply be a casual summary of themes in a heavy metal background. But for those Metallica fans who want to learn more about the motivation of the band and get into their minds, and why they find themselves attracted to Metallica and heavy metals, from
Metal and philosophy from
Provides an ideal overview of these most important concepts.
Orignal From: Review of Metals and Philosophy
No comments:
Post a Comment