Wake up, the United States: a thin line between border security and oppression!

Most Americans, regardless of politics, partisanship, and loyalty, agree that it makes sense to provide our country and citizens with reasonable border security and a holistic, well-thought-out immigration policy. Safe, safe, we need and desire! Unfortunately, some politicians, such as President Trump, seem to be trying to use it for personal/political agendas, as well as their own interests/advantages! Trump has created a political marketing machine that, unlike anyone else, has lend a helping hand to attract prejudice and fear, rather than seeking a meeting of any mind for the common good! He campaigned by analogy between the so-called South Wall and border security. As president, he reminded us that he kept his promise on this issue without mentioning that his initial commitment was that Mexico would pay for it. This is a glorious, solution-based, focused, or just wall-use as a symbol, although most experts claim that this is an ineffective, overly simplistic, and extremely expensive approach? These experts point out that not only Mr. Trump's attempts are ineffective, but the combination of other methods [including drones, technology and humans] will be more effective and effective in achieving safety and border security objectives. At a lower cost! Historically, when countries resorted to the wall, many people equated it with attempts, oppression and restrictions on human rights. With this in mind, this article will attempt to consider, review, review and discuss some of the differences. Rhetoric / satire, symbols and effective policies.

1. from

Wall: from

Supporters of the wall, pointing to the historic Great Wall of China, the walls used by Israel, the Berlin Wall, etc. as examples of walls, keeping those that are considered unwelcome, dangerous/dangerous or unwelcome, in specific areas Outside. The memory of these other walls evokes memories of the oppressive government that seeks to limit everyone's basic human rights, freedom, freedom and justice. In addition, in areas with existing walls, they were defeated by tunnel construction. For example, drug cartels often bring drugs, regardless of the so-called security. Other obstacles involve geographic restrictions [such as mountains and water] and the need to announce well-known areas in order to use existing land that is already private.

2. from

Where do most drugs, contraband, smuggling, etc. happen? from

Statistics show that for the vast majority of items, we want to limit, enter, and enter through borders rather than through unattended areas. There are many reasons for this. It is that along this 2,000-mile section, many places are so challenging, experiencing risks, more than rewards!

3. from

Alternatives: from

In addition to the construction of the barrier, there are other alternatives that provide border security more efficiently and efficiently, at a lower cost! These include the use of drones, radar, technology and human protection.

So why is President Trump so concerned about this issue and agreeing to physical barriers in terms of consistency, equality, security and border security? Yes, give priority to our safety and security, or just a try, motivate and motivate his core supporters, and Develop a sense of prejudice and hatredFor personal/political reasons/ages and self-interest?

---

Orignal From: Wake up, the United States: a thin line between border security and oppression!