I try to gain insight into the essence of God from some of the greatest minds, the existence of human beings, and our ability to transcend what is often called self-protection - the "most powerful" human instinct. In addition, my arguments delineate the myth that human beings are mortal animals - simply living and dying.
If things are as simple as traditional biology tells us, what causes a spouse or parent to exchange his or her life for his lover? Perhaps love and the sacred human spirit provide us with a natural spiritual hegemony that transcends our "greatest human instinct" and pushes one to transcend our "captures", the original motive force for survival. It goes without saying that we are back to where we started. The questions still to be answered focus on whether human beings are eternal lives?
I did some research about the possibility that a person is alive at this time - living on the planet we call Earth. Let's go back and look at it.
Remember, our universe became a "singularity" 13.7 billion years ago.
Although I have been flirting with the possibility of eternal life [in some form or form] and something or someone as a great designer of the universe, I have not used the word "religion" - right?
Comparing Apple and Apple, I will use the word "belief" to compare beliefs with the scientific beliefs behind the Big Bang theory.
We know that our universe was born nearly 14 billion years ago, however, ask scientists how the big bang occurred. ' You may get a response like this, with the universe erupting an unknown universe trigger 14 billion years ago. "Well - an unknown cosmic trigger... an unknown cosmic trigger? Beat me, but definitely need some faith to believe one!
Logic tells me that there are two forms of competition in faith, the belief in the form of scientific theory and the belief in something or someone, that is, higher power. I tend to look for strong evidence to support a particular belief.
Suppose some unknown cosmic trigger causes me to sit in front of my computer typing, which requires me to believe in the existence of a cosmic trigger. So, what is a reasonable substitute for an unknown cosmic trigger? Of course, probability and statistics! I will explain my point of view without delving into the subject of mathematics.
I pointed out above that I did some research on the possibility of living alone today - living on the planet we call Earth. First of all, no matter what beliefs you overlap, you are a miracle - at least in the eyes of probability and statistics.
Through the violent and turbulent early days of the Big Bang to the formation of the Earth 4.5 billion years ago, you "survived" hundreds of millions of catastrophic events, such as the meteor hitting the Earth, killing 80% of the life on Earth, including dinosaurs. Before 66 million years ago.
From the big bang to your pregnancy and birth, you are indeed a miracle, because your statistical probability here is about 400 trillion. I think that a person is more likely to win a lottery than thousands of times in a row.
Is statistical science a fact or a belief? Perhaps the probability of surviving on Earth [400 trillionth of a percent] is completely nonsense, because statistical analysis can be a daunting task in controlling critical variables while analyzing and normalizing data.
Frankly speaking, it may be too difficult to draw a valid conclusion. I don't have a good answer. However, I think it is more cautious to tie a horse to a carriage that loses the steering wheel, the unknown cosmic trigger.
Einstein continued to uphold the theology of God. He is awed by the beauty and complexity of the universe, but cannot accept the idea of a God who interferes with human history.
The concept of Einstein's beauty is that it resonates with the awe of the beauty and complexity of the universe. Of course, something or someone must participate in the beautiful design of the universe.
Perhaps Einstein correctly saw that the beauty of the universe reflects the beauty of something or someone outside the universe. If God keeps silent, we can only say that Einstein said - "The vast darkness of the universe presents a transcendental suggestion."
Earnest Becker writes: "Human breakthroughs are only the boundaries of cultural heroism; he destroys his role as a hero in daily social planning; and by doing so, he opens himself to infinity, and the hero of the universe Doctrine... He puts his inner secret, his true talent, his deepest sense of uniqueness... with the foundation of creation. Self defines the ultimate meaning.
The invisible mystery of this biological core now gains the meaning of the universe by affirming its intangible mystery with the creation of the core. "This," he concluded, "is the meaning of faith."
According to Becker's point of view, faith is the belief that despite the existence of "insignificance, weakness, death, a person's existence has meaning in some ultimate sense because it exists in an eternal and unlimited mind and maintenance. Among the things. Designed by some creativity.
Becker's views on cosmic design and creativity are not as bold as Einstein's cosmic perspective, including unconventional God, or "something or someone" outside the universe... I explain this For higher power.
I will end with a sentence from Albert Einstein. "The science without religion is lame, and the religion without science is blind."
Orignal From: Scientific religion: facts or beliefs
No comments:
Post a Comment